Skip to main content

Wyrmwood: Road of the Dead

I've decided to create a blog for movies that I watch. Just new movies, for the time being. I haven't spent as much time doing it (watching movies) as I have in the past, but am trying my best to sit through a new film every day.

The last film I watched was called Wyrmwood: Road of the Dead. It was recommended to me by Netflix, which does this based on films that you rate; the more you rate, the more "accurate" the recommendations. In this case, it hit a bull's-eye, because this movie was great.

So what constitutes great in zombie films? There's plenty of sub-genres. This one was a comedy of sorts (many are) and as it just so happened, it was pretty damn funny. Part of the humor was in the dialogue (with one character in particular being especially hilarious) and also in the visual gags. The action was hyper-choreographed, zany and over the top in a way that I haven't seen in earnest since Peter Jackson's Dead Alive or Sam Raimi's Evil Dead series. It's like watching a really elaborate domino effect machine at play and I, for one, couldn't look away.

There was quite a few digital shots and similar computerized gore effects that have been plaguing zombie films (and other genres) for years. At the same time, there was a good amount of practical gore and make-up effects, as well, which more than made up for it. It wasn't just your typical 12-gauge shotgun to the head. Some of the deaths here were incredibly creative.

But the creativity applied to the writing, as well. The story has something to do with Revelations, from the Bible. Though honestly there is almost no exposition in this film. It's entirely explained in ways that seem appropriate from characters that should be saying these things (one character is a Catholic). I never stopped and thought, "Well, it seems rather convenient that this character knows all of this." At the same time, there were some interesting ideas used here in regards to the zombies themselves that felt rather fresh and inspired. For example, the use of zombie mind control, though never fully explained, was rather fun, turning the zombies into a useful tool instead of something to be afraid of. I don't believe I've ever seen a film successfully do this (in Day of the Dead, the soldier zombie was "friendly" to a degree, but oh-so-clumsy and slow and not exactly under anyone's control). Or flammable zombie blood. Why is it flammable? Who knows? The point is that it makes for some very fun moments in a film that could have very easily been a much more straightforward affair.

Lastly, the fight scene at the end was quite enjoyable simply because the hero avoids the Angry Hero Always Wins trope. I cannot, for the life of me, stand heroes that win simply because the script demands it. Here, the hero does prevail, but he doesn't really win the fight. He basically picks a fight with a professional soldier and gets his ass handed to him. The way that he wins is a combination of luck and quick thinking and it really was the film's biggest surprise because the soldiers in the masks had all been faceless up to this point and could have stayed that way. Instead, we end the film with the best duel I've seen in years. It's unusual for a zombie film to do this but made me like it even more. It worked for Lethal Weapon and Sword of the Stranger. It works here, too.

Obviously this is a genre-film. Most of the jokes will go over people's heads unless you've seen the classics. It's gory and silly but also serious and smart. You could say it runs hot and cold, but I thought it was mostly tongue-and-cheek, and in the best possibly way. It tells you a serious story and then smirks.






Comments

Popular posts from this blog

My Two Cents: An Interview with Ahdy Khairat

Hello, everyone! My name is Nicholas van der Waard. I have my MA in English Studies: the Gothic, and run a blog centered on Gothic horror, Nick's Movie Insights. However, if you follow Ahdy Khairat's channel on YouTube, you probably know me as "the two cents guy." With this post, I wanted to interview Ahdy himself and talk to him about his work. But first, a bit of history...


Preface
March 25th, 2018. It was a dark Manchester night. I was wearing a Cthul-aid t-shirt and standing in the kitchen of my student-provided flat. Holding my phone in my hand, I was making myself some dinner (rice, eggs and soy sauce—a student diet if ever there was) after a seminar earlier in the evening. I had on my headphones and was listening to some nightly music—some subscribed content on YouTube when Ahdy Khairat's latest remaster, "Call of Ktulu," popped up.

This caught my eye; I had several of Ahdy's remasters on my iPod, and enjoyed his work. However, I also knew he …

Dragon Ball Super: Broly (2019) - Is it Gothic?

Can Dragon Ball be Gothic? As a scholar of the Gothic, that's exactly what I wondered when I sat down to watch Dragon Ball Super: Broly (2019). In the movie, the death god Beerus literally takes a vacation. The Gothic mostly does, too, but let's take a closer look...


The movie more or less starts with King Vegeta looking upon his infant son, Prince Vegeta. Incubating inside the royal saiyan maternity ward, the boy is small; his power levels are not. The king looks smug. "I look forward to watching you grow into a vicious king!" he boasts. King Vegeta and those under him work for King Cold, an even bigger tyrant. At the movie's start, Cold retires, putting his son in charge. Ever the enfant terrible, Freiza belittles the saiyans for their poor technology. After killing a handful for seemingly no reason, he introduces the now-infamous scanners for the survivors to use. With more explanation than the original show ever bothered to provide, DBS: Broly throws the sava…

Is Garfield (1978-present) Gothic?

This article begs the question, "Is Garfield Gothic?" So many textual mutations of the cat have recently emerged. I shall outline some of them, here.

Is Garfield Gothic? At first glance, the answer would seem to be no. For decades, he's been nothing but a fat cat who likes lasagna. There are no allegories about him. What you see is more or less what you get.

I can assure you, this is only the beginning.
Upon further consideration, the answer is less simple. The Garfield of the present exists in many more forms than he originally did, years ago. He's no longer produced exclusively by Jim Davis; there are "other Garfields" out there, made by other people as (debatable) tribute. Some are funny because they are different than, but reminiscent of, the parent version; and some of are monstrous, and largely for the same reasons. Once there was one; now there is Legion.


One of the "other Garfields." Familiar, and very, very wrong.
All stem from the Jim Davi…